Anonymous structs can make code harder to understand and maintain, especially when they contain multiple fields or are nested within other
structs.
When you use anonymous structs for complex data structures, you create several problems:
- Poor readability: Nested anonymous structs create deeply indented code that is difficult to scan and understand quickly.
- No reusability: Anonymous structs cannot be reused across different parts of your codebase, leading to code duplication.
- Testing difficulties: You cannot easily create instances of anonymous struct types in test files, often forcing you to
duplicate the struct definition.
- Limited documentation: Anonymous structs cannot have their own methods or be documented separately, reducing code clarity.
Named types solve these issues by providing clear, reusable definitions that can be documented, tested, and maintained independently. They also
make your code more modular and easier to refactor.
What is the potential impact?
Using anonymous structs for complex nested structures reduces code maintainability and readability. It can lead to code duplication across files,
make testing more difficult, and create confusion for developers working with the codebase.
